Galois theory
From Exampleproblems
|
In mathematics, Galois theory is a branch of abstract algebra. At the most basic level, it uses permutation groups to describe how the various roots of a given polynomial equation are related to each other. This was the original point of view of Evariste Galois. The modern approach to Galois theory, developed by Richard Dedekind, Leopold Kronecker and Emil Artin, among others, involves studying automorphisms of field extensions. Further abstraction of Galois theory is achieved by the theory of Galois connections.
Application to classical problemsThe birth of Galois theory was originally motivated by the following question, which is known as the Abel-Ruffini theorem.
Galois theory not only provides a beautiful answer to this question, it also explains in detail why it is possible to solve equations of degree four or lower in the above manner, and why their solutions take the form that they do. Galois theory also has applications to several ruler-and-compass construction problems in geometry. For example,
In all cases, the construction must be accomplished by straight-edge and compass alone. The permutation group approach to Galois theoryIf we are given a polynomial, it may happen that some of the roots of the polynomial are connected by various algebraic equations. For example, it may turn out that for two of the roots, say A and B, the equation A2 + 5B3 = 7 holds. The central idea of Galois theory is to consider those permutations (or rearrangements) of the roots having the property that any algebraic equation satisfied by the roots is still satisfied after the roots have been permuted. An important proviso is that we restrict ourselves to algebraic equations whose coefficients are rational numbers. (One might instead specify a certain field in which the coefficients should lie, but for the simple examples below, we will restrict ourselves to the field of rational numbers.) These permutations together form a permutation group, also called the Galois group of the polynomial (over the rational numbers). This can be made much clearer by way of example. First example — a quadratic equationConsider the quadratic equation
By using the quadratic formula, we find that the two roots are
Examples of algebraic equations satisfied by A and B include
Obviously, in either of these equations, if we exchange A and B, we obtain another true statement. For example, the equation A + B = 4 becomes simply B + A = 4. Furthermore, it is true, but far less obvious, that this holds for every possible algebraic equation satisfied by A and B; to prove this requires the theory of symmetric polynomials. We conclude that the Galois group of the polynomial x2 − 4x + 1 consists of two permutations: the identity permutation which leaves A and B untouched, and the transposition permutation which exchanges A and B. As a group, it is isomorphic to the cyclic group of order two, denoted Z/2Z. One might raise the objection that A and B are related by yet another algebraic equation,
which does not remain true when A and B are exchanged. However, this equation does not concern us, because it does not have rational coefficients; in particular, √3 is not rational. A similar discussion applies to any quadratic polynomial ax2 + bx + c, where a, b and c are rational numbers.
Second example — somewhat trickierConsider the polynomial
which can also be written as
We wish to describe the Galois group of this polynomial, again over the field of rational numbers. The polynomial has four roots:
There are 24 possible ways to permute these four roots, but not all of these permutations are members of the Galois group. The members of the Galois group must preserve any algebraic equation (with rational coefficients!) involving A, B, C and D. One such equation is
Therefore the permutation
is not permitted, because it transforms the valid equation A + D = 0 into the equation A + C = 0, which is invalid since A + C = 2√3 ≠ 0. Another equation that the roots satisfy is
This will exclude further permutations, such as
Continuing in this way, we find that the only permutations remaining are
and the Galois group is isomorphic to the Klein four-group. The modern approach by field theoryIn the modern approach, one starts with a field extension L/K, and examines the group of field automorphisms of L/K. See the article on Galois groups for further explanation and examples. The connection between the two approaches is as follows. The coefficients of the polynomial in question should be chosen from the base field K. The top field L should be the field obtained by adjoining the roots of the polynomial in question to the base field. Any permutation of the roots which respects algebraic equations as described above gives rise to an automorphism of L/K, and vice versa. In the first example above, we were studying the extension Q(√3)/Q, where Q is the field of rational numbers, and Q(√3) is the field obtained from Q by adjoining √3. In the second example, we were studying the extension Q(A,B,C,D)/Q. There are several advantages to the modern approach over the permutation group approach.
Solvable groups and solution by radicalsThe notion of a solvable group in group theory allows us to determine whether or not a polynomial is solvable in the radicals, depending on whether or not its Galois group has the property of solvability. In essence, each field extension L/K corresponds to a factor group in a composition series of the Galois group. If a factor group in the composition series is cyclic of order n, then the corresponding field extension is a radical extension, and the elements of L can then be expressed using the nth root of some element of K. If all the factor groups in its composition series are cyclic, the Galois group is called solvable, and all of the elements of the corresponding field can be found by repeatedly taking roots, products, and sums of elements from the base field (usually Q). One of the great triumphs of Galois Theory was the proof that for every n > 4, there exist polynomials of degree n which are not solvable by radicals—the Abel-Ruffini theorem. This is due to the fact that for n > 4 the symmetric group Sn contains a simple, non-cyclic, normal subgroup. The inverse Galois problemSee main article: inverse Galois problem It is easy to construct field extensions with any given finite group as Galois group. That is, all finite groups do occur as Galois groups. For that, choose a field K and a finite group G. Cayley's theorem says that G is (up to isomorphism) a subgroup of the symmetric group S on the elements of G. Choose indeterminates {xα}, one for each element α of G, and adjoin them to K to get the field F = K({xα}). Contained within F is the field L of symmetric rational functions in the {xα}. The Galois group of F/L is S, by a basic result of Emil Artin. G acts on F by restriction of action of S. If the fixed field of this action is M, then, by the fundamental theorem of Galois theory, the Galois group of F/M is G. It is an open problem (in general) how to construct field extensions of a fixed ground field with a given finite group as Galois group. External links
References
fr:Théorie de Galois he:תורת גלואה nl:Galoistheorie ja:ガロア理論 pt:Teoria de Galois ru:Теория Галуа |
|
