# Correlation

### From Exampleproblems

*This article is about the correlation coefficient between two random variables. The term*correlation*can also mean the cross-correlation of two functions or electron correlation in molecular systems.*

In probability theory and statistics, **correlation**, also called **correlation coefficient**, is a numeric measure of the strength of linear relationship between two random variables. In general statistical usage *correlation* or co-relation refers to the departure of two variables from independence. In this broad sense there are several coefficients, measuring the degree of correlation, adapted to the nature of data.

A number of different coefficients are used for different situations. The best known is the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, which is found by dividing the covariance of the two variables by the product of their standard deviations. Despite its name it was first introduced by Francis Galton.

## Contents |

## Pearson's product-moment coefficient

### Mathematical properties

The correlation ρ_{xy} between two random variables *X* and *Y* with expected values μ_{X} and μ_{Y} and standard deviations σ_{X} and σ_{Y} is defined as:

Since μ_{X}=E(X),
σ_{X}^{2}=E(X^{2})-E^{2}(X) and
likewise for Y, we may also write:

The correlation is defined only if both standard deviations are finite and at least one of them is nonzero. It is a corollary of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality that the correlation cannot exceed 1 in absolute value.

The correlation is 1 in the case of an increasing linear relationship, −1 in the case of a decreasing linear relationship, and some value in between in all other cases, indicating the degree of linear dependence between the variables. The closer the coefficient is to either −1 or 1, the stronger the correlation between the variables.

If the variables are independent then the correlation is 0, but the converse is not true because the correlation coefficient detects only linear dependencies between two variables. Here is an example: Suppose the random variable *X* is uniformly distributed on the interval from −1 to 1, and *Y* = *X*^{2}. Then *Y* is completely determined by *X*, so that *X* and *Y* are as far from being independent as two random variables can be, but their correlation is zero; they are uncorrelated. However, in the special case when *X* and *Y* are jointly normal, independence is equivalent to uncorrelatedness.

### The sample correlation

If we have a series of *n* measurements of *X* and *Y* written as *x _{i}* and

*y*where

_{i}*i*= 1, 2, ...,

*n*, then the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient can be used to estimate the correlation of

*X*and

*Y*. The Pearson coefficient is also known as the "sample correlation coefficient". It is especially important if

*X*and

*Y*are both normally distributed. The Pearson correlation coefficient is then the best estimate of the correlation of

*X*and

*Y*. The Pearson correlation coefficient is written:

where and are the sample means of *x _{i}* and

*y*,

_{i}*s*

_{x}and

*s*

_{y}are the sample standard deviations of

*x*and

_{i}*y*and the sum is from

_{i}*i*= 1 to

*n*. As with the population correlation, we may rewrite this as

Again, as is true with the population correlation, the absolute value of the sample correlation must be less than or equal to 1.

The sample correlation coefficient is the fraction of the variance in *y _{i}* that is accounted for by a linear fit of

*x*to

_{i}*y*. This is written

_{i}where *σ _{y|x}^{2}* is the square of the error of a linear fit of

*y*to

_{i}*x*by the equation

_{i}*y = a + bx*.

and *σ _{y}^{2}* is just the variance of

*y*

Note that since the sample correlation coefficient is symmetric in *x _{i}* and

*y*, we will get the same value for a fit of

_{i}*x*to

_{i}*y*:

_{i}This equation also gives an intuitive idea of the correlation coefficient for higher dimensions. Just as the above described sample correlation coefficient is the fraction of variance accounted for by the fit of a 1-dimensional linear submanifold to a set of 2-dimensional vectors (*x _{i}* ,

*y*), so we can define a correlation coefficient for a fit of an

_{i}*m*-dimensional linear submanifold to a set of

*n*-dimensional vectors. For example, if we fit a plane

*z = a + bx + cy*to a set of data (

*x*,

_{i}*y*,

_{i}*z*) then the correlation coefficient of

_{i}*z*to

*x*and

*y*is

## Non-parametric correlation coefficients

Pearson's correlation coefficient is a parametric statistic, and it may be less useful if the underlying assumption of normality is violated. Non-parametric correlation methods, such as Spearman's ρ and Kendall's τ may be useful when distributions are not normal; they are a little less powerful than parametric methods if the assumptions underlying the latter are met, but are less likely to give distorted results when the assumptions fail.

## Other measures of dependence among random variables

To get a measure for more general dependencies in the data (also nonlinear) it is better to use the correlation ratio which is able to detect almost any functional dependency, or mutual information which detects even more general dependencies.

## Copulas and correlation

Most people erronously believe that the information given by a correlation coefficient is enough to define the dependence structure between random variables. But to fully capture the dependence between random variables we must consider the copula between them. The correlation coefficient completely defines the dependence structure only in very particular cases, for example when the cumulative distribution functions are elliptic (as with, for example, the multivariate normal distribution).

## Correlation matrices

The correlation matrix of *n* random variables *X*_{1}, ..., *X*_{n} is the *n* × *n* matrix whose *i*,*j* entry is corr(*X*_{i}, *X*_{j}). If the measures of correlation used are product-moment coefficients, the correlation matrix is the same as the covariance matrix of the standardized random variables *X*_{i} /SD(*X*_{i}) for *i* = 1, ..., *n*. Consequently it is necessarily a non-negative definite matrix.

The correlation matrix is symmetrical (the correlation between *X*_{i} and *X*_{j} is the same as the correlation between *X*_{j} and *X*_{i}).

## "Correlation does not imply causation"

The conventional dictum that "correlation does not imply causation" is treated in the article titled spurious relationship. See also correlation implies causation (logical fallacy). However, correlations are not presumed to be acausal, though the causes may not be known.

## External links

- Statsoft Electronic Textbook
- Pearson's Correlation Coefficient - How to calculate it fast
- Learning by Simulations - The distribution of the correlation coefficientde:Korrelation

fr:Corrélation (mathématiques) he:מחקר מתאמי it:Correlazione nl:Correlatiecoëfficiënt pl:Korelacja su:Korélasi sv:Korrelation